by The NHS will shift a large amount of care of hospitals to new municipal health centers in order to bring the treatment of human houses closer and to shorten waiting times. Keir Strandmer will sign on Thursday.
The prime minister will describe radical plans to grant patients in England much easier access to general practitioners, scans and mental health in institutions that are open for 12 hours a day, six days a week.
The health service must “reform or die” if it reveals his 10-year health plan.
However, experts said that the planned revolution in the way the NHS works, through employee shortages, close public finances, a lack of premises in which “one-stop-shop-style-“-neighborhood health “and a public counter reaction to the downgrading of hospitals is undermined.
“Our 10-year health plan will fundamentally wire and make our NHS again so that the doors of the people look after, the technical tech uses and primarily prevents the diseases.”
“That means giving every access to general practitioners, nurses and broader support under one roof in its neighborhood – to restrict our health system so that it fits the life of the patients.”
In the Guardian, Streeting writes that the NHS, which has received a funding thrust of 52 billion GBP as part of workers, must change dramatically in order to ensure or risk his own future not to become sustainable.
He warns that his model of health care is being attacked for every citizen who is free at the point of use, and says: “This government rejects the pessimistic view that universal health care in the 20th century, but not in the 21st
“If the NHS does not change, the argument that it is not sustainable will be more convincing. It is really change or bust. We choose changes.”
Making care for patients more conveniently by the new clinics is the key to the government’s plan to invent the NHS as a service in which more in community environments and less in hospitals that have been overwhelmed in recent years due to the increasing need for care.
This is accompanied by two other “major shifts”: improved use of technology and stronger emphasis on the health service, which prevents diseases instead of treating them.
The public’s dissatisfaction with the inability of the NHS, to ensure quick access to GPS, A&E E-Care and Pirurgy as well as the previous commitments of Starrer in order to get it back to the legs, means that the provision of the government’s assets described in the 143-page plan of the government will be the assets of the government.
Health Thinketanks warned that the plans would take a long time and that the patients would not see any real change for some time.
“Most people in this country want the NHS to survive and thrive because they rely on it,” said Steve Brine, a former conservative Minister of Health.
“Whether this plan and the financing of the health secretary was able to secure herself to secure herself is sufficient so that people have an open question.”
The complexity and the political risks associated with the modernization of an estimated public service raises questions about whether Sarmherer and streets “have the stomach to go to the type of transformation they say,” he said.
The “neighborhood centers” are staffed by doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical experts as well as from specialists for debt counseling and employment, the ministers say.
They offer services that are traditionally provided in hospitals, as can diagnostic tests, postoperative care and rehabilitation. They will be open for 12 hours a day, even in the evening and on weekends, although this will happen at some point, the Ministry of Health and Social Care (DHSC) admitted.
Health Thinketanks criticized the lack of details of the DHSC about the centers, including where they would be, who would occupy them, where the financing for the construction of new facilities comes and when they would actually open.
Sarah Woolnough, the managing director of the King’s Fund, welcomed the shift from hospital to community base and one more friendly NHS, but said that it was “repeated by successive governments. Although the vision itself is welcome, the vision is not new.
“The radical change would deliver the vision. The story has shown that you do not simply guide various members of the health professions in a building together and expect a health service to be flourished in the neighborhood.”
Thea Stein, her counterpart in the Nuffield Trust, who is a former NHS -Trust boss, said that the change in the health service is to be signed as a strand, “is a tough, complex work, the management of politicians and NHS employees equally obliged to challenge cultures and dynamics of power and to create new ways to guide you”.
