The letters were sent – and they come again and again.
US President Donald Trump makes his promise to continue to use new collective bargaining prices for America’s trading partners, and is again increasing for Truth on Wednesday to publish details on trade rules for a handful of countries after they announced on Monday for a dozen nations of tariffs for a dozen nations.
More from WWD
In separate letters, Trump placed the service rates for the Philippines (20 percent), Brunei (25 percent), Iraq (30 percent), Libya (30 percent) and Sri Lanka (30 percent), including a provision that states that a transfer of shifts from the Evading Tariff in another location is equipped. If the countries take revenge against the USA with their own duties, these tariffs will be adopted on the tariffs defined by the President this week.
Regardless of this, Trump aimed at Brazil with a bloated tariff of 50 percent, with the government’s indictment against the former president and Trump-allied Jair Bolsonaro, who is now on trial, due to a conspiracy for the cancellation of the 2022 elections in 2022, which he lost. Trump has also questioned Brazil’s recent decision that the US social media platforms should be held accountable for certain user content.
The stilted nature of the president of the president of the tariffs as well as the lack of specificity of the new rules and breaks or delays in implementation have sown the confusion among industry connoisseurs.
Monica Gorman, former special assistant of the US President Joe Biden for the production and industrial policy (and an experienced supplychain expert for brands such as GAP, New Balance and American Eagle), told the sister publication of the WWD sourcing journal. Pharmaceuticals.
“There is clearly a focus on critical sectors and the need for a risk” and some lawful concern about China’s “Chokehold” in the global supply chain for essential inputs such as rare earth minerals. “All of this is going on, and textiles and clothing – although they are of crucial importance for the military and the American consumer – is none of these focus industry,” she said.
“I think [Most-Favored-Nation tariff] The prices that most industries do not do, and so this will not be the focus of political decision -makers, unless they are familiar with the industry, ”said Gorman.
The President and Chief Executive Officer of shoes and retailers of America, Matt Priest, wrote an open letter to the ambassador of US trade representative Jamieson Greer, who explains this point on Wednesday, and asked the department not to stack new tariffs about already serious duties for shoes.
“For decades, the shoe industry has been running under a significant tariff load, which is larger than in almost every sector. While the average tariff rate for consumer goods is a little more than 2 percent, the average shoe tariff rate is 12 percent before new tariffs are added,” he wrote.
According to the priest, the tariffs for children’s shoes are astronomical and often achieve an installment of 48 percent or more. “While the president announced a new 20 percent tariff for Vietnamese-drawn products, many children’s shoes from Vietnam already have a tariff of 20 percent,” he wrote. “This raises the important question before shopping at school: Why should shoes and American families pay another 20 percent if they already pay 20 percent?”
Gorman said this could be an important stumbling block for brands. “There was no clarity from the administration when stacking MfN with these additional IEPA tasks, but it is very important for this industry,” she added.
The new tariff rules are also cloudy in connection with the envelope. “According to the current US customs law, the envelope is illegal. But because we have now seen that it suggests not only in the business with Vietnam, but also in the letters that go to different countries that it is the rules of origin,” said Gorman.
The trading expert said that the inclusion of the transmission clause on his face aims to regulate products or content that comes from China, which would underline the president’s long-term motivations for the re-compensation of the US trade.
“We are in somewhat unsettled territory. In the past, original rules have been an incredibly complex series of negotiations that were carried out at the trading discussions, and it is one of the reasons why trade agreements took so long in the past because there are many interests,” said Gorman, stating that the rules of industries, product categories and even individual products.
Over time and the start date on August 1st for the new tariff regime, there is no information for importers or customs to determine the content of the “transfers” the higher performance rates could trigger. In view of the limited understanding of the legislators for the global fashion supply chain, Gorman believes that it is “essential” for the industry to work for themselves with civil servants, “why the supply chains look as they do today.
If the object of the transmission clause is to remove the movement of China – and reduce dependency, you must understand the size of what it would mean to shift entire supply chains to other parts of the world. “If you want to move the fabric, talk about mills and capital investments for mills. When you talk about shoes, do we speak the forms that make the soles made in China that are normally produced in China?” she said. “It’s nothing you will get up overnight.”
To the uncertainty of the moment is the fact that these political changes were imposed by executive measures in contrast to a longer -term, congress -oriented trade policy process. A new administration – or perhaps even the current one – could dissolve these recent management orders with the pen and continue to ask companies how the trade landscape will look for the coming months and years.
A certain clarity is equipped with more official notifications from the White House and a Federal Register or an official notification of customs with further details.
“My best advice is [to] Stay the course – diversify the supply chains if possible, ”she added and said that it was“ impossible to drive these waves of tariff ”.
“It is simply too unpredictable, and so without security: diversification, if possible, double procurement for key elements, if possible. This is a good practice anyway, but it can prove to be valuable if, for example, we see significantly variable tariff rates across Southeast Asia,” she said.
Best of WWD
Register for the WWD newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
by 
