August 30, 2025
The National Weather Service defends its flood warnings in the middle of a new examination of the cuts of the Trump employees
Uncategorized

The National Weather Service defends its flood warnings in the middle of a new examination of the cuts of the Trump employees

Deadly floods in Texas, in which thousands crawl with little warning for security reasons, have triggered a new round of checking the Trump administration for the National Weather Service.

At least 79 people are dead and many others miss an area called “Sturb flood” on Sunday evening after floodwaters suddenly went through Texas Hill Country.

Within a few hours after the flood in the early Friday morning, some Texas officials were critical of the NWS and said that forecasts underestimated the precipitation. MP Jack Kimble, D-Calif., On Saturday he published a critical criticism of NWS cuts of X in response to a post by Vice President JD Vance. On Sunday, President Donald Trump refused to investigate whether the NWS cuts had left important vacancies, and the White House said that the claim that NWS had to do with the tragedy were “disgusting”.

Independent meteorologists and a former NWS official said that warnings in the run-up to the floods of this weekend were roughly as prompt and exactly as it was to be expected, with the weather data available in real time. The prediction of extreme rainfall and floods over several hours is a challenge, and it is also not easy to ensure that urgent warnings achieve the most endangered warnings.

“The forecast was good. The warnings were good. It is always about getting people to get the message,” said Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist based in Wisconsin. “It seems that this is one of the greatest participants – this last mile.”

The meteorologists said they did not believe that understaffed offices were a main factor for the tragic result, although NWS has leadership gaps according to a failure to cut off.

Tom Fahy, the legislative director of the National Weather Service Employees Organization, a union that represents the government employeeSSaid that the weather forecast in San Antonio did not occupy two of its top positions – a constant science officer (a role that conducts training and is responsible for the implementation of new technologies) or a warning coordination meteorologist (which is coordinated with the media and the public face of the office), although employees act in these management quantities. Overall, Fahy said that the offices were sufficiently occupied with meteorologists to react to the event.

“The WFOs [weather forecasting offices] I had adequate staff and resources when they published timely forecasts and warnings in the run -up to the storm, ”Fahy said on Saturday, but added that he was obtained about the non -filled leading positions and vacuum cleaners.

In a statement, the National Weather Service said that it was “broken by the tragic loss of life in Kerr County”. The agency did not answer any questions about the staff, but provided a detailed timeline of the warnings it sent.

Some Texas civil servants have proposed that the forecast of the National Weather Center did not impart the storm’s threat, while others said they were grateful for timely warnings from the agency.

“The original forecast that we received from the National Weather Service on Wednesday forecast three to six inch rain in the Concho Valley and four to eight inch rain in the hilly country,” said Texas Emergency Management boss W. Nim Kidd at a press conference on Friday. “The amount of rain that fell in this special place was never in one of these forecasts.”

The National Water Center stated that Kerrville, Texas and its surrounding areas on Thursday, July 3, on Thursday, July 3., could be at risk of a timeline of the National Weather Service. Then NWS Austin/San Antonio gave a flood guard on Thursday at 1:18 p.m. until it continues until Friday morning. The office spent its urgent flood flood warnings at 1:14 a.m. for Kerr County.

The judge of Travis County, Andy Brown, thanked the National Weather Service for his warnings. Eric Carter, the head of the district’s emergency management coordinator, described the service as “very proactive in her warnings”.

The agency found that on Friday at 1:14 a.m. CT at 1:14 a.m. CT with a day with “considerable” or “catastrophic” license plates, which would trigger wireless emergency warnings on activated mobile devices.

“In the night of July 3 and in the early morning of July 4, Flash Flood’s preliminary runs were issued, with preliminary forward times of more than three hours …”, the explanation says.

After the Trump administration released the National Weather Service employees and also offered buyout and early retirement after the Trump administration. At the beginning of June, the National Weather Service lost around 600 employees. Many veterans -NWS employees left the agency together with employees on probation and recently hired or promoted.

In some NWS offices, personnel loss of more than 40%has been determined, and the agency has tried to take over critical roles in some prognostic agencies. At least eight offices did not stop more than 24 hours a day this spring this spring, and some have hung the start of the weather balloon.

In May, more than 40% of the country’s weather forecasts had the vacancy rate of personnel lettings over 20%. The cuts prompted all living former directors of NWS to write a letter in which concerns about the level of personnel and future budget cuts were expressed.

“Our worst nightmare is that weather forecasts will be so understaffed that there will be unnecessary loss of life. We know that it is a nightmare that is shared by the forecasts of front lines – and on the people who depend on their efforts,” they wrote.

Compared to many forecasting offices across the country, the Texas offices remain relatively well staffed.

Fahy said the office for the weather forecast in San Antonio/Austin participates with 11 meteorologists from employees and deployed six employees from its typical full staff level of 26. He also found that the nearby office in San Angelo, which published warnings for parts of the central texas central texas, is a short employee of four employees who was unable to put the top position of the staff. The office is also without a conductive hydrologist.

“There is no hydrologist in San Angelo, and that’s a problem,” said Fahy. Hydrologists analyze the current flow and play a key role in the flood reaction.

Dalton Rice, City Manager from Kerrville, said the city would investigate whether its own emergency notifications are robust enough to warn the residents.

“We know that questions about emergency notification are asked, and although it is not time to speculate, local and regional partners are obliged to check the existing events and systems,” said Rice in a press conference on Sunday. “At the right time we will take clear steps to strengthen our future willingness. We owe the commitment to families who suffer and every member of our community.”

Prominent independent meteorologists who have been criticized in the past against NWS personnel and budget cuts have stated that Federal Meteteorologists have issued timely warnings on site.

Alan Gerard, the former director of the branch for analysis and understanding of the NOAA laboratory for serious Storms, wrote in a blog post that the forecast office of Austin/San Antonio communicated the risks as soon as possible.

“Of course, it is not optimal to have both positions free for a long time and certainly have negative effects on a certain level,” wrote Gerard. “However, when only the actual warning services that NWS provided during the event, they were solid and exhibited the warning and warnings that the public should expect for an event like this.”

Matt Lanza, a meteorologist based in Houston, said that there are no initial signs that personnel levels or budget cuts played a role in the tragedy.

Vagasky, the Wisconsin meteorologist, said that the prediction of flood floods and extreme precipitation was notoriously difficult.

“The quantitative precipitation forecast, so -called QPF, is one of the most difficult things that meteorologists have to do. You have to get the right place, the right amount, the right timing,” said Vagasky. “They were aware that this was an important event and they reported that.”

According to Vagasky, the remains of the tropical storm Barry moved to Texas and fed tropical moisture to severe thunderstorms, which were expelled through central texas and beat the region with extreme precipitation.

He added that the cadence, through which prognostics, increasingly fit the concerns of the weather models and what he would expect.

The Texas Hill Country is often referred to as a “falling flood yard” because its topography can transport the rivers and swell quickly. Exactly knowing where the rain will fall is the key to hydrological models to understand where the effects of floods would be worse.

“The forecasts this week concerned 4-7, 5-9 inch rain, somewhere there. And some models showed higher quantities. Knowing the higher amount of three miles in this way?” Unfortunately, science is simply not at this point where you can say: ‘Ok, I know that we get so much rain in this special latitude and length. “

The time overnight of the heaviest precipitation and the increase in flood is a nightmare scenario for forecastics, said Vagasky.

“Storm response in the middle of the night is one of the biggest challenges. Then we see most of the Tornado deaths and most flooded deaths. People sleep. They cannot rise the tornado or water,” said Vagasky. “Had people had their emergency warnings on their phones?”

Vagasky, who criticized critical reductions and cuts in weather balloon publications in the National Weather Service, said that he did not think a better staff had prevented the tragedy.

“These are important positions that need to be filled,” he said, adding that “probably no significant contribution to what happened”, no longer contributed. “

According to Vagasky, there is plenty of space to improve quantitative precipitation forecasts that could help the forecasters to identify the threats earlier. Such research is at risk if the administration cuts the financing of NOAA, as it explained, he said.

“The big concern is the latest budgetary request, if it goes through the congress as the administration wants, all Noaa research laboratories are closed that are the laboratories that do the work to improve this forecast.”

This article was originally published on nbcnews.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *